Do you think Hansi Cronye's team was far more beter than Gream Smith's team?
Please..Give at least one reason.
News Flash.. African Lions Mauld by Royal Bengali Tigers.Can Ya believe it?
ya croni'e team was better in the sense that it was a balanced team with excellent BOWLING G AND BATTING, unlike today's where we have crappy bowling and good batting.... that being said, cronie's team dominated every other team besides the only team that they needed to beat to win a wcup, yup u guessed it: the Aussies. And today's team does have the capability of beating the Aussies and they are less of a choker than in the past... however their bowlers better improve or else they can kiss the wcup trophy good bye.
Reply:AAAAHHHHHHAHAHAHA!!! Neither, they're both as crap as each other. The SAffers can't handle pressure and it's ajoke that the ICC have them ranked at No. 1, we (aussies) destroyed them and now they've lost to bangladesh!! SAf are a truly feeble team on the BIG STAGE!
Reply:ya hansi crnje's team was beter.
Reply:As an Aussie I'm glad to see Bangladesh beat S.A but i don't think this will make much difference to the final 4 which will be Australia,S.A,New Zealand and S.L , S.A are still a good enough side to win the world cup besides this loss,and for us Aussies we need to be at the top of our game to beat any of the other 3 sides when it comes to the finals.
Reply:The current team is better (wish Alan Donald was in it). The batting has more depth and fielding is top class.
Today's loss to Bangladesh may have been avoided if SA would have batted first. Sa did win the toss. Gream what were you thinking? Slow pitch + leg spinners = bat first.
On the bright side, SA did not lose points to NZ, Eng or WI. It was Bangladesh. So if SA wins at least 2/3 remaining games, they will be in the semis.
Reply:cronye had best SA team
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment